infrastructure · provisioning
Sistema demo dei gestionali
A prospect should not be handed an empty system. They get theirs, already full, with their own brand inside it.
cat ./context.md
Fymera product · 2026
./role --ours
In-house architecture and development
Before and after
how it was
Trialling a management system usually fails before it starts: whoever registers finds an empty system and would have to create the company, categories, products, images, price lists and users before working out whether they need it. Almost nobody gets to the end.
what we built
A system that prepares the demo for them: an environment already populated with a catalogue, products, variants, materials, users, documents and the prospect own branding. You log in and the system already works.
$ ls ./components
How it is built
-
01
Automatic provisioning
Every demo is created with its own database schema, a control plane to create and delete it, and an expiry date.
-
02
Real isolation
No falling back on the main database: the data in one demo never touches another demo, nor production.
-
03
Populated and personalised
A plausible catalogue and the prospect brand: what gets judged is the product, not your own patience for loading data.
$ ./results --after
How it turned out
[ok] The evaluation starts from a working product, not from data entry
[ok] Every demo isolated, with expiry and deletion built in
[ok] It is the feature that sets the Fymera management systems apart
// services involved
$ ls ./other-cases
Got a similar project?
Thirty minutes on video to work out whether it is worth doing, and what it really costs. If we are not the right people, we will say so.
